- Should the site be built on WordPress or something else?
- Either can work. What matters more is that the firm can edit a practice-area page without a developer, that the forms post somewhere you control, and that the site loads fast on a phone. We will make a recommendation based on who maintains it after launch, because a platform nobody in the office can update becomes stale within a year and stale procedural content on a law firm site is a liability.
- Do we need a client portal or online payments?
- Payments, usually yes, because clients expect it and it shortens the gap between a decision and a retainer. A full portal is a bigger commitment and is worth building only if someone in the firm will keep it current. An abandoned portal is worse for client confidence than no portal.
- Can we publish results or client reviews on the site?
- Sometimes, subject to the Florida Bar's advertising rules on past results and testimonials, and subject to your own clients' willingness to be identified in a family matter. We generally design pages that persuade without them, and treat anything you do want to publish as something to confirm with your own counsel first.
- How much content does a family law site actually need?
- Fewer pages than most agencies sell, written far better. One strong page per matter type, one per attorney, one per courthouse you appear at, plus a small set of procedural explainers specific to the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit. Twenty excellent pages beat two hundred spun ones, and they are maintainable, which matters when an administrative order gets reissued.
- What about live chat and AI chatbots?
- Chat can lift inquiry volume, and it also captures sensitive text from someone whose device may be shared. If you use it, choose a provider whose data handling you have actually read, keep the bot from giving anything resembling legal advice, and make sure a human sees the transcript quickly. A chat widget that answers at 11pm and then nobody follows up by morning does more harm than good.