- An agency wants to pay a local creator to mention us. Can we?
- Take that question to the State Bar of Texas and your own counsel before you take it to the media buyer, because paying for a recommendation and disclosing an endorsement are governed by attorney advertising rules rather than by platform norms. What is plainly open is the unpaid version: go on the podcast, answer the questions, discuss nobody's matter, and let the host keep their audience.
- Our videos look amateur next to what people post here. Does that hurt us?
- Not in this practice area. Somebody deciding whether to leave a marriage is not judging your color grade, and a produced piece about custody reads as an advertisement, which is the thing they are trying to get away from. Spend on a microphone and accurate captions, which in this city you can hire by the hour, and leave the rest alone.
- Should we publish during the big festival weeks?
- Publish, but do not launch anything and do not put money behind it. Promoted inventory gets bid up by advertisers with far deeper pockets, downtown becomes hard to move around, and a calm family law explainer is competing with a stage. Save the launch and the budget for the weeks on either side.
- A caller's main asset is stock that has not vested. Can we make a video about it?
- Yes, about the paperwork. Which documents exist, what they are usually called, where people find them, and why nobody can give a number without reading them. Anything more specific on camera turns into a correction in the first meeting, and in this metro you would be giving that correction often.
- The heat means we cannot film outside for months. Does that matter?
- Only if the plan depended on it, and it should not. Outdoor footage adds atmosphere and very little else in this practice area, and from late spring into the fall it costs a dawn call to get anything usable. Whatever you can say in a quiet room is worth more to a reader in a bad month than anything you can say in front of a building.