- Every firm here says it is bilingual. Why would a feed change anything?
- Because saying it and showing it are different. A page listing Spanish as a language is a claim. An attorney explaining a foreign custody order in Spanish, on camera, is proof a viewer can evaluate in one sentence. The feed does not out-shout anyone. It makes one lawyer a recognizable person to households who otherwise pick from a list of identical claims.
- Can we just add Spanish subtitles to our English videos?
- Subtitles help, but they are not the same asset. A subtitled English clip reads as content made for someone else and then handed over. Record separate takes when the topic matters, subtitle the rest, and put your effort into the Spanish versions of the two or three subjects that bring in the most work.
- Are we allowed to talk about cases we have handled?
- Not in any way a person could be identified or a result implied. Confidentiality governs the facts, and the Bar's advertising rules govern what a firm may suggest about outcomes. Teach the process instead, and confirm current requirements with the Florida Bar or your own counsel before publishing anything close to the line.
- Our only Spanish speaking attorney is in trial for much of most months. What cadence is realistic?
- Set it from her calendar rather than from a content plan, and publish only what she can also answer. A Spanish video that draws Spanish messages nobody can reply to for a week does more damage than a quiet month. Let the English side run at its own pace and stop treating the two as one schedule.
- Can a translation service write our Spanish scripts?
- A translator is useful as a check, not as the author. The script should be written by the person who will say it and take the call, because the questions arrive in different words than the English ones do. Then have somebody read the translated lines for anything that now promises more than the English did, including the wording the Bar requires you to carry.