Spanish campaigns need their own budget, not a spare ad group
Two languages in one campaign means one auction decides how much of your money each audience gets, and it will not decide the way you would.
Separate campaigns give you separate budgets, separate bids, separate schedules and separate negatives. Inside a shared campaign, whichever language happens to convert cheaper that week quietly consumes the other one's spend, and you find out a month later.
The keyword sets are not mirror images either. A Spanish search for family counsel often includes the country context, the word for lawyer varies by origin, and the long tail is shaped differently. Building it by translating the English list produces terms nobody types and misses the ones they do.
Each language needs its landing page in that language, its own call extension routing to someone who can answer in it, and its own form. Sending Spanish clicks to an English page is the fastest way to pay full price for a bounce.
Set the account's reporting so you can read the two sides independently from day one. Retrofitting language segmentation onto a blended account is painful and usually approximate.
Pace spend to the hours a bilingual intake person is at the desk
Clicks are not the constraint in this practice area; the person who answers the phone is, and paid budget spent outside their hours converts poorly.
Map when you can genuinely answer in each language. If Spanish calls are covered from nine to four but English runs to six, the two campaigns should not share an ad schedule.
Evenings and weekends still matter in family law, because a lot of decisions get made after a bad Sunday. Rather than turning ads off, decide what happens to that click: a form that promises a specific callback time, a scheduling link, or an answering service briefed to take the matter type and language and nothing more.
Watch the daily pacing rather than the monthly total. A campaign that exhausts its budget by noon is not efficient, it is invisible for the second half of every day, which in this market is where a competitor picks the call up.
Monthly rhythm is worth checking too. Inquiry patterns in family law are not flat, and pacing that ignores this ends the month with either an unspent budget or a week of silence.
Set location targeting to presence, or you will pay for clicks from abroad
In a county with this much international connection, the default targeting setting will buy you a steady stream of clicks from people who cannot retain you.
Google's default includes people interested in your location, not only those in it. Change it to presence. Otherwise you fund searches from anyone abroad reading about Florida divorce, and a family law click here is not cheap enough to donate.
Layer the geography rather than drawing one radius. Doral, Hialeah, Kendall, Brickell and Coral Gables differ in the matters that come from them and in what a matter is typically worth, and bid adjustments should reflect that rather than treating the county as uniform.
Negatives do more here than in most accounts. Free, pro bono, forms, DIY, self representation, salary and law school terms, plus the names of every practice area you do not take. Review the search terms report weekly for the first two months and monthly afterward.
Bear in mind that a genuine cross-border matter is not the same as a wasted click. Someone in the county whose spouse is overseas is a real inquiry. The exclusion you want is on the searcher's location, not on the subject of the case.
Spanish ad creative has to be written, not translated, on Meta especially
Paid social is where a family law firm reaches people before they search, and translated copy is the tell that stops them trusting you.
Search catches people who have already decided to look for a lawyer. Paid social reaches the far larger group still deciding, and in this county a meaningful part of that group scrolls in Spanish.
Copy translated word for word reads as an advertisement aimed at somebody else. Write it in Spanish, with the register a client would actually use, and be careful with regional variation in how family relationships and legal steps are described.
Keep the targeting sober. Interest and behavior signals around relationships are limited by platform policy for good reason, so geography, language and a well-built lookalike from your own consultation list usually outperform clever audience stacking.
Video and static both work, but the creative that earns replies tends to answer a specific question about how a matter proceeds rather than announcing that the firm exists. Free consultation as a headline attracts people shopping for free, which is a different problem to solve.
Professional-network targeting is for referral sources in Brickell, not for people getting divorced
Nobody browsing a professional network is looking for a divorce attorney, but the people who refer the best matters are on it all day.
Wealth managers, CPAs, therapists, immigration counsel and family office staff send the matters with real complexity. Reaching them takes a different budget line, different creative and a much longer horizon than a search campaign.
Target by job function and by employer in the financial and professional cluster around Brickell and Coral Gables, and lead with substance: how a business interest is generally treated, how cross-border assets complicate discovery, what a referring adviser should ask a client early.
Expect the cost per click to be high and the volume to be low. Judge this line on conversations started and referral relationships opened, never on form fills, and give it a small fixed budget rather than letting it compete with search for money.
If the firm does not want to write for this audience, skip it. Half-hearted thought leadership on a professional network is worse than absence.
Count consultations that happened, and count them by language
A form fill is not a lead, a lead is not a consultation, and a consultation that nobody attended is not revenue.
Define the stage that matters: a consultation held. Everything upstream of it is a proxy, and in family law the gap between booked and attended is wide enough to reverse the ranking of two campaigns.
Push that stage back into the ad platforms as an offline conversion where your case management system allows it. Optimizing toward form fills teaches the algorithm to find people who like filling in forms.
Report cost per held consultation separately for each language. The two will differ, sometimes considerably, and the answer is not automatically to move budget to the cheaper one. A market you can serve with less competition may deserve more money, not less.
Call recording and call tracking need a policy in this practice area, including consent and retention, and it is worth confirming the approach with your own counsel before switching anything on.
Questions we actually get
- How should a budget be split between English and Spanish campaigns?
- Start closer to even than instinct suggests, then let held consultations move it. Most firms underweight Spanish at the outset because their historical data comes from an English-only site and an English-only phone line, which is a measurement artefact rather than a finding about the market. Give each language its own budget so the shift is a decision you make rather than one the auction makes for you.
- Is Local Services Ads worth running alongside a search account?
- It can be, and it sits under different rules on screening, badge eligibility and how disputes are handled, so it is worth reading the current requirements directly rather than assuming they match the search account. Treat it as a separate channel with its own reporting. Where it does work, it tends to produce calls rather than form fills, which raises the question of who answers them and in what language.
- What should we exclude before spending anything?
- Presence-only location targeting, so you are not paying for interest from outside the country. Then the standard commercial negatives: free, pro bono, forms, templates, do it yourself, salary, law school. Then every practice area you do not take, because family law queries overlap with immigration, estate and criminal terms constantly in this county. Review search terms weekly at first.
- Why measure cost per consultation held rather than cost per lead?
- Because the two rank campaigns differently. A campaign producing cheap form fills from people who never attend looks superior on a cost per lead report and inferior on every measure that matters. The consultation that happened is the first point where the inquiry has cost your firm real time, which makes it the first honest unit of comparison.
- Does paid social actually generate family law matters or just impressions?
- It generates inquiries, but on a delay, and it will not show up cleanly in a last-click report. People rarely see an advertisement and retain counsel the same afternoon. Judge it over a longer window, ask new inquiries where they first heard of the firm, and keep the creative written in the language of the person scrolling rather than translated into it.
