Morgul Marketing

    A divorce firm website built for a phone with one bar on the F train

    Most people who reach a family law site here arrive on a phone, alone, in a hurry, and often somewhere with a poor connection. They are comparing a few firms in a few minutes and they have two questions before any of your content matters: do you work in the borough where this will be filed, and what does the first meeting cost. A site that answers those in the first screen and loads fast enough to be read between stations outperforms one with better photography and a longer story. Everything below is about building that, and about what the inquiry form has to capture for this trade specifically.

    Talk to us

    Name the boroughs you appear in before you name the firm's values

    The first screen has one job, which is proving you handle this kind of matter in the county where it belongs.

    A visitor in Astoria does not care about the firm's founding philosophy until they know you appear in Queens. Put the boroughs and counties in plain text at the top, not in a service area map and not in the footer.

    Add the matter types in the same breath. Divorce, custody, support, modification, protective orders. Someone with a custody question should see the word custody without scrolling.

    State what the first meeting costs and how long it takes. Firms resist this because it sounds like commoditizing the work. In practice it filters out people who were never going to pay and reassures the ones who will.

    Skip the rotating banner and the mission statement. Nothing in the first screen should be there because the template had a slot for it.

    A page that only works with signal fails on the express to Queens

    Your real performance budget is a phone at low battery on a train that loses signal for minutes at a time.

    Long stretches of the subway have no usable connection, and a page that needs to fetch four fonts, a hero video and a chat widget before it renders anything shows a blank screen for the entire ride.

    Get the first meaningful paint down by serving text first. System fonts or one self-hosted weight, real HTML content rather than content assembled by script, images sized and compressed for the device that is actually asking.

    Third party scripts are usually the problem. Chat widgets, session recorders, tag managers loading five more tags, review carousels pulling from an external service. Audit them, and drop anything nobody has looked at in six months.

    Test on a mid-range Android over a throttled connection, not on the newest phone in the office over the office Wi-Fi. The gap between those two experiences is where inquiries are lost.

    The inquiry form should ask what kind of apartment it is

    Two fields that a template form will never include tell you more about a New York matter than anything else on the page.

    Ask which borough or county each party lives in. The answer generally decides where the matter belongs, and knowing it before the call saves the first five minutes of every consultation.

    Then ask about the home: rented, owned, co-op shares, or a stabilized lease. In this city that single question sorts a straightforward matter from one involving a board, a proprietary lease and a transfer that will need approval. It also tells you what the consultation should cover.

    Keep the rest short. Name, a safe way to reply, and the matter type. Everything else can be asked by a person. Long forms on a phone are abandoned, and a divorce form is abandoned faster than most.

    Include a field for how and when it is safe to contact them, and honor it. Some people cannot take a call at home, and a voicemail at the wrong moment does real damage.

    A directions page that names the train line and the lobby desk

    Getting to an office in this city is a genuine obstacle, and a page that removes the uncertainty gets people to the consultation.

    Say which train and which exit. Say whether the lobby desk requires photo identification and how long that takes. Say which floor, and whether the elevator bank on the left goes there.

    If your office is a walk-up, say so. Someone with a stroller or a mobility issue needs to know before they arrive, and finding out at the door is the kind of thing people write reviews about.

    Photograph the actual entrance from the sidewalk. A picture of your own doorway does more for a nervous first-time visitor than any interior shot, and it costs one afternoon with a phone.

    Add the practical details nobody publishes: whether there is anywhere to wait, whether a child can come along, what to bring.

    Booking should offer a video slot first, because crossing the city costs a half day

    For a parent in Bay Ridge or Flushing, an in-person meeting in Manhattan is a day off work, and the booking interface should reflect that.

    Put real available times on the page rather than a request a callback button. A visitor comparing three firms will book with whoever shows a Thursday morning slot and leave the other two forms unsent.

    Offer video as an equal option, listed first, with in-person available for anyone who wants it. Travel time is the most common reason a booked consultation does not happen here.

    Show the fee at the point of booking, not after. Surprises at that stage produce no-shows, and a no-show costs the firm an hour it cannot resell.

    Send a confirmation that a person will actually read, with the time, the format, the fee and what to bring. If it is in person, link the directions page.

    Say who you do not take, and the inbox gets better

    Publishing the boundaries of the practice removes work from intake and makes every remaining inquiry more likely to be worth a consultation.

    Firms avoid this because it feels like turning away business. It is the opposite. Every inquiry that a page could have deflected still costs a staff member fifteen minutes on the phone.

    Be specific. The counties you file in, the matter types you take, whether you handle post-judgment work, whether there is a minimum you can sensibly take on. Frame it as helping people find the right firm, because that is what it does.

    Add a short referral note for the people you turn away. It costs nothing, it is the decent thing to do, and referrals travel both directions in a bar this size.

    Privacy belongs on the site as well. A quick exit control, a plain note about browser history, and restraint with recording scripts are functional requirements on a divorce site, not extras. Analytics on pages about protective orders is a decision worth making deliberately.

    Questions we get

    How fast does the site really need to be?
    Fast enough that the first screen renders on a mid-range phone over a weak connection. Use Core Web Vitals as the reference and test on throttled mobile rather than office Wi-Fi. Most legal sites fail on third party scripts and oversized hero imagery long before they fail on anything structural.
    Should we use live chat?
    Only if a person is behind it during posted hours. An automated chat that collects a name and promises a callback is worse than a good form, and on a divorce site it introduces a transcript that has to be handled carefully. If nobody is staffing it, remove it.
    Do we need a separate page for each borough?
    For the boroughs where you actually appear, yes, and make each one different: the courthouse, the trip, the kinds of matters, the attorneys who cover it. Cloned pages with the name swapped read as filler to visitors and are not worth publishing.
    What about photographs of the attorneys and the office?
    Real photographs of the actual people and the actual building outperform stock imagery, and they are usually lighter files than the skyline photo they replace. Nervous first-time visitors are looking for evidence you are a real firm with a real door.
    Is it a mistake to publish fees?
    Publishing the consultation fee and the format is nearly always worth it, and it reduces wasted intake time. Publishing a full retainer figure is a firm-by-firm judgment, though an honest range with an explanation of what drives it tends to build more trust than saying nothing at all.

    Written by KC Thompson, Morgul Marketing. Updated .

    Talk to us about web design for family law firms in New York

    Tell us about your business and where your marketing stands. We'll tell you what we'd do first, and what we'd leave alone.

    We won't add you to a mailing list. A person will reply.