St. Louis, MO

    In St. Louis the content is inside a brick building with the power shut off

    A brokerage here has an unusual amount of building to work with and almost nobody filming any of it. Long vacant brick warehouses sit with the service disconnected, which makes a walkthrough a job rather than a stop between showings. The walls in that stock are structure as much as skin, so where a new door can go is a real question with a real answer. The research and medical employers keep producing requirements that ordinary office content does not touch. And the city line means a company building a shortlist is often working from a map that does not describe the government it will actually deal with. Four things worth publishing, and no national page is going to produce a single one of them.

    The power has been off in that brick warehouse for years

    Filming a long vacant building is a logistics problem before it is a creative one, and this metro carries more of that inventory than most.

    Ameren service to a building that has stood empty a long time is usually disconnected. No lights, no working elevator, nothing to plug into, and in a multistory warehouse that means the upper floors are a stair climb with the gear on somebody's back.

    Daylight is the entire budget. Boarded windows, a light well and whatever the front elevation gives you decide what can be filmed at all, so the shot list gets made on the walk rather than at a desk beforehand.

    Bring a battery light and work slowly. A phone hunting for exposure in a dark masonry interior produces noise, and noise reads to a viewer as a worse building than the one you are standing in. One light aimed at a column, a floor and a window opening does more than a second camera would.

    Film the structure rather than the emptiness. Timber or slab, column spacing, the freight opening, the loading side, the stair, the roof access. A vacant building is just a shell to a viewer until somebody standing in it points at the parts that decide what it can become.

    A brick wall is structure, so a new door is a bigger question than it looks

    The stock here is load bearing masonry rather than a frame with a skin, which changes what an occupier can do to a building and what your content should explain.

    A wall carrying the floors above it is not a wall anybody cuts a dock door into casually. Where an opening can go, how wide it can be and what has to carry the load above it are governed by what the wall is already doing, and in most of this inventory it is doing plenty.

    It comes up on nearly every deal in the older stock. A tenant wants an overhead door, a second exit, a wider storefront opening, or a loading position on a different side of the building. The answer is rarely no, but it is never free and never quick.

    So film the wall as a structural object. The existing openings, the thickness at a window reveal, where the floor framing lands, what a previous owner already cut and patched and how that was handled. Occupiers read a great deal off that once somebody tells them what they are looking at.

    The same footage reaches the owner who has watched freeze and thaw work on masonry for thirty years. Anyone who has held a brick building in this climate looks at the joints and the parapet before they look at a rent number, and a firm that films the north elevation honestly is not the firm being asked why the video skipped it.

    A research requirement is not an office requirement in a brick building

    The medical and research employers around the Central West End produce space needs that ordinary office content has nothing useful to say about.

    A spin out, a practice group or a small research team is not shopping for a floor plan. They are asking about floor loading, vibration, the height available above a finished ceiling, exhaust routing, and whether power and water can reach a bench where they want the bench.

    Old brick and heavy timber answer some of that well and some of it not at all, and the difference is invisible in a listing photograph. A floor that will carry equipment and a stair that will never carry it into the building are in the same property.

    Content for that reader looks different from the rest of your feed. Less photography and more measurement, a walk that stops at the mechanical room and goes up to the roof, and a plain account of what a building would need before anybody could work at a bench in it.

    Almost nobody local is making it. The general office material on every brokerage feed in the metro speaks to a tenant who wants desks, while the requirements coming out of this cluster have the least written behind them and the longest memory for whoever wrote it.

    An independent city is the fact every out of town shortlist gets wrong

    The City of St. Louis is legally separate from St. Louis County, an arrangement almost nowhere else in the country has, and a newcomer building a list of buildings has no idea.

    A company weighing an address in the Central West End against one in Clayton is comparing two governments rather than a center against a suburb. Add the many small municipalities across the county and the Metro East across the Mississippi in Madison County and St. Clair County, and the map behaves like several states at once.

    Locals never explain it, because saying it out loud feels like explaining that water is wet. So the plainest and most useful piece of content in this market has not been made by anybody, while every relocating company and every out of town broker asks the same question in their first conversation.

    Make it once and make it plain. What the line changes for a company registering, permitting and staffing on either side of it, why two addresses a short drive apart answer to different offices, and what somebody ought to ask before they build a shortlist at all.

    It stays useful for years, which is rare for anything published on a feed. Re-record it when practice changes, and let it be the piece your firm is known for locally.

    The parts that would read the same in any market, from how often to publish to what deserves money behind it, are set out once at /industries/commercial-real-estate/social-media.

    Questions we actually get

    The building we want to film has no power at all. Is it worth doing?
    It is usually the best footage you can get, because nobody else has been in there with a camera. Bring battery lighting, plan the route on foot before you start filming, and treat the stair as the constraint on how much gear goes upstairs. Shoot slowly and let the light settle on one thing at a time. A dark, noisy phone video makes a sound building look derelict, and a lit column with a window behind it does the opposite.
    A tenant wants to add a dock door. How much of that belongs in a post?
    The physical facts, and not a schedule. Show where the existing openings sit, what the wall looks like at a reveal, where the floor framing lands and what somebody has already cut and patched over the years. That is enough for an occupier to understand why a new opening in load bearing masonry is a piece of work rather than a weekend, and it is a far better conversation than discovering it after a lease is signed.
    What should we be making for the medical and research audience?
    Measurement led content rather than photography. Walk the mechanical room, go up to the roof, talk about floor loading and vibration and where exhaust could route, and be specific about what a given building would need before a bench could go into it. That reader is comparing buildings on constraints, not on finishes, and there is very little published locally that speaks to them at all.
    Everybody here already knows the city is not in the county. Why publish it?
    Because a company relocating here does not. It builds a shortlist on the assumption that a metro is one government, and then finds that two addresses a short drive apart answer to different offices. Explaining what the line actually changes is the piece of content with the longest life in this market, and it stays unclaimed precisely because everybody local assumes it is too obvious to say.
    Should our Illinois buildings get their own content?
    They need their own answers, which is not quite the same thing. The specification conversation about a building in Belleville is the same conversation as one in south county, but the government conversation is not, and an occupier deciding across the river is weighing a second state's rules. Publish the comparison rather than a coverage claim, and put a broker who actually works that side in front of it.

    What is different here

    Brokerage is licensed and advertising generally has to identify the brokerage rather than only the individual. The more practical constraint is that this industry is bought at submarket grain: a downtown tower and a suburban flex park are different products with different tenants, and content pitched at a whole metro tends to speak to neither.

    Written by KC Thompson, Morgul Marketing.

    Talk to us about social media for commercial real estate firms in St. Louis

    Tell us what you are working with and we will say what we would do first, and what we would leave alone. A real answer, not a pitch deck.

    No newsletter, no drip sequence. One reply from a person.